Page 217–242

Shortlink : https://www.waxmann.com/artikelART105498
.doi: https://doi.org/10.31244/zfe.2023.02.03

free download

Abstract

At face value, it could be argued that, during the pandemic, UK Government policymaking (like that in some other countries) came close to being evidence-based, in the sense that it drew on virological and epidemiological evidence about the spread of the virus, as well as on a broader range of scientific evidence about what measures were likely to be successful in dealing with it. I consider what this case can tell us about the complexities and limits of evidence-based policymaking, and about the conditions required if closer approximation to a model of rational decision-making drawing on scientific evidence is to be achieved. In particular, I examine: problems caused by uncertainties surrounding scientific evidence and advice; issues to do with the channels of communication by which scientific information reached policymakers; the fuzzy interface between evidence and grounds for policy action; and the contextual factors that affected both its reception and its production – in particular, the role of interests and ideology.

Keywords
Evidence-Based Policymaking, Policymaking in the COVID-19 Pandemic, Complexities of Scientific Evidence, Role of Ideology and Interests in Policymaking

APA citation
Hammersley M. (2023). Was the UK Government’s Policymaking ‘Evidence-Based’ During the Pandemic? Reflections on Science and Politics. Zeitschrift für Evaluation, 22(2), 217-242. https://doi.org/10.31244/zfe.2023.02.03

Zeitschrift für Evaluation